| Deviant Login | Shop |
 | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Resources & Stock Images / Clipart | ©2012-2013 ~Russian-Fox |
)
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
Wood, steel, brass. I myself almost forgot about brass.
Why not use a real Winchester and use that gun as target practice (Although that might be a little too expensive).
One of those with the wood replaced with just straight synthetic stock and grip wouldn't be so bad- without all the tacti-crap piled on, like a modern refreshment of a classic design. But this proves that you can't beat a classic. Old wild west guns should just stay in the wild west.
/rant.
Maybe, maybe a conventional, synthetic, non-"tactical" stock like you said could be okay. Maybe. I dunno though. When it comes to 19th Century designs...steel, brass and wood are what comes to mind.
But this "tacti-cool" shit? Uh. No. Just no. Straight up no. And looking at it, note the caliber. Its offered in the classic .30-30 round. What, no "tactical 5.56mm" or anything? I'm almost surprised.